Viewing the World through God's Word

Month: June 2016 (Page 2 of 3)

Fatal Faith

O PreacherI woke up in a strange land.  A dangerous, decaying city where dark eyes stared threats wherever I turned.  I knew no one.  Nor the language.  Nor where to go.  On a narrow street a dark giant approached.  I cowered.  But, in my own tongue, he offered to get me home.  “You can trust me.  Just do what I tell you.”  This is the nature of James’ faith.  Faith that follows the one trusted.  Faith that transcends words and evidenced in action.

What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no works? Can such faith save him? (James 2:14).

Well,  can’t it save him, Paul?  ” . . . a person is not justified by works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ” (Galatians 2:16).    Confronted with a classic contradiction.  James asks rhetorically  No good comes from faith without works.  No more than . . .

If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?” (James 2:15,16).

Another rhetorical.  Words won’t warm chilled bones or fill empty stomachs.

So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead (James 2:17).

“Dead” faith.  Opposite of “alive.”  Opposite of “useful, effective.”  Faith that can’t save, not the naked nor the hungry nor the sinner.  Useless because it’s lifeless.

Proper to pause here.  Typically, we read this passage in theological terms only.  We feel pressed to answer: How shall we solve the doctrinal conundrum between Paul and James?  Not an unworthy question, to be sure.  James, though, is writing as a concerned pastor.  He’s anxious that his dispersed Jewish Christians may not be acting consistently with their profession of faith in Christ.

This is where James speaks to us.  Faith-professions have become “easy-believism.”   Occasionally observing unseemly behavior, a friend remarks,  “And she’s a Christian?”  To borrow a term from German pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, faith that doesn’t show itself in action is cheap, just as grace that doesn’t “work.”

“Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession, absolution without personal confession. Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate” (Bonhoeffer).

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.  You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that– and shudder (James 2:18,19).

“Someone” seems to have gotten his challenge backward.  I’d expect him to say, “You have deed; I have faith.”  Confusing.  But Jame’s argument is clear enough—and hits with a harsh, blunt blow.  Intellectual faith (faith that believes that there is one God but lacks deeds) remains invisible  and is, in fact, demon-like.  ‘Nuff said.

You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless?  Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar?  You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.  And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend.  You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.  In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? (James 2:20-25).

James (rather un-pastor-like) calls this “someone” man “foolish” (Greek, kenosliterally “empty-headed.”)  Which reminds me of the old line:  “Be careful you’re not so open-minded that your brains fall out!”  In this case, it’s empty-headed to make faith whatever you want it to be.

To underscore his argument, James offers two key examples of faith from the Jewish Scriptures.

Abraham, the patriarch.  He was “considered righteous for what he did.”  Provocative, James.  A bit edgy given Genesis 15:6—“And [Abraham] believed the LORD, and he counted it to him as righteousness.”  God counted Abraham’s belief in the promise as righteous.  But James considers Abraham’s action that followed his faith. . . his faith was working together with his works.”  Not faith or works.  Not faith plus works.  Faith expressed by works.  Faith working together with his works (the zenith being obediently offering his only son Isaac on an altar).

A more mundane illustration I’ve used a thousand times.  “I believe  this chair will hold me.  It’s only living, useful faith when I sit down.”  (I sit.  Thankfully, chair held.)  Faith then is “made complete” (Greek, teleioo—brought to consummation, perfected) by what we do.  Faith without commensurate action is not firing on all cylinders.  John Calvin:  “Faith alone justifies, but the faith which justifies is not alone.”

Rahab, the prostitute.  Far less esteemed a person than Abraham, but the same family of faith.  Rahab believed the spies—and acted accordingly. 

Now a bit gross, a corpse example . . .

As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead (James 2:26).

No spirit in the body, the body’s dead.  No deeds in the faith-profession, faith’s dead.

* * * * *

What prompted James to launch into “faith without works is dead”?  One can only theorize.  But context brings us back to his rebuke against the sin of partiality (2:1-13).   He means for his Jewish-Christian readers to fulfill “the royal law” and ” . . . love your neighbor as yourself” (2:8),   Such love, irrespective of persons, is sorely needed among these dispersed-among-the-nations Christians.  They must not only profess faith in King Jesus, they must not only maintain ceremonial aspects of the faith, they must work their faith in neighbor-love.  It won’t merit them anything.  But it will prove in which master they truly believe.

It’s a strange land where we live.  Getting stranger by the day.  Someone has offered to take us home.  We must trust him.  And, trusting, do what he says.

 

 

Spiritual Gifts: Just Then or Now Too?

O PreacherThe question shouldn’t be left to Bible scholars or serious theologians.  It has important practical and personal ramifications for the whole church of Jesus Christ.

For example, in Romans 12:6 Paul writes, “Having gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us us them . . . ”  If spiritual gifts have ceased, then the “user” has no gift-grace to offer and the recipient none to receive.  We might say grace in the form of gifts is scarcer now than in the first century.

Again in 1 Corinthians 12:7, Paul writes, “To each person is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.”  And in 1 Corinthians 14:12, Paul admonishes the church, ” . . . since you are eager for the manifestations of the Spirit, strive to excel in building up the church.”  If these manifestations have ceased, the Body of Christ no longer receives “good” from them and is left without a means of upbuilding available earlier.

Recently I discovered an excellent study by Dr. Sam Storms.  He introduces himself as “an Amillennial, Calvinistic, charismatic, credo-baptistic, complementarian, Christian Hedonist.”  (If  you draw a blank at any of those terms, don’t worry.  Just remember we’re saved by grace through faith!)  Since 2008, Sam has  been Lead Pastor for Preaching and Vision at Bridgeway Church in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Below are links to the study.  If you have any interest in this subject or especially if you’re trying to decide on which side of the line you should stand, I heartily recommend this to you.

http://www.samstorms.com/all-articles/post/are-miraculous-gifts-for-today—part-i

http://www.samstorms.com/all-articles/post/are-miraculous-gifts-for-today—part-ii

What do you think?  Just then or now too?  I’d love to hear from you!

 

 

 

Discrimination-Free Zone

O PreacherBack in the mid-1970’s we planted a church in a prosperous northern New Jersey community.  Businessmen and women daily commuted to New York City and back.  And I fantasized:  “Maybe some honcho high on a corporation hierarchy will join our little church!  Think of the prestige!  The tithes!”  Well, we gathered in wonderful people, but no Exxon-Mobil executive.  Fine with James . . .

My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don’t show favoritism (James 2:1).

James cares about his readers (“My brothers”)—Jewish Christians dispersed among the nations because of faith in the Lord Jesus Messiah, cut off from their homeland, struggling to survive.  And, therefore, most susceptible to fawn over the rich and ignore the poor.  “Don’t!”  Glory is not in possessions but the Lord.

Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in.  If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, “Here’s a good seat for you,” but say to the poor man, “You stand there” or “Sit on the floor by my feet,” have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? (James 2:2-4).

“Suppose” doesn’t imply make-believe.  James’ anecdote is true.  And why should it not be?   Can’t we find the same partiality in ourselves?  Had my Exxon-Mobil executive shown up, I would have tripped over myself making him welcome and comfortable, barely noticing the bad-smelling homeless man who came by bike.

The probing question:  ” . . . have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?” 

Discriminated” implies evaluating the difference between things.  In this case, on the basis of outward appearance.  It leads to judging the finely-dressed to be worth more and the shabbily-dressed less.  Pastor Kim Riddlebarger’s comment reminds us how abhorrent their attitude:  “This is especially heinous at a time when such people (the poor Jewish Christians) are suffering, not because they somehow angered God who is now punishing them, but because they have come to believe that Jesus is the Lord of glory and now they are being persecuted because of their profession of faith in Christ” (http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/sermons-on-the-book-of-james-p/).

Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him?  But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court?  Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?  (James 2:5-7).

In 1978 Donald Kraybill authored, The Upside-Down Kingdom.  So God’s reign is.  The world celebrates the wealthy.  When’s the last time a magazine published “The 100 Poorest People in the World”?  But God has chosen “those who are poor in the eyes of the world” to be rich in more than money–“faith.”  (A treasure given by grace and worth more than the Powerball Lottery prize.)   Ah, that poor beggar, rich?  Yes, now rich in faith with his name written as heir to “the kingdom [God] has promised those who love him.”

But, see what you’ve done, James urges.  By pushing aside the poor, you’ve opposed God.  You’ve actively treated the poor with contempt.  At the same time you’ve honored those who exploit you and drag you into court and slander the name of Christ your Lord.

(By the way, James doesn’t hint that the rich are all evil and the poor all holy.  He writes in general terms, which history shows accurate.  More often than not the wealthy enjoy their “heaven on earth”, while the poor stand more open to the Gospel.)

It occurs to me this rich man/poor man discrimination probably isn’t a Top Ten Problem in Today’s Church.  (Or maybe my church world is too small.)  Bigger than rich-poor discrimination is straight-gay discrimination.  As I see it, if we suspect a church visitor is gay, sirens flash.  We feel a sudden pressure to run to the rest room.  We “discriminate”  (evaluate their difference)— and decide that difference is a gulf too dangerous or unpleasant to span.  We certainly don’t treat them like an  Exxon-Mobil executive.  I know this isn’t a simple issue.  More needs addressing that I can say here.  Sure, God calls homosexual practice sinful.  He does the same with adultery.   But, since God loves the world, shouldn’t we?  Since we belong to the king who loved prostitutes, shouldn’t we obey our king’s royal law and love the gay?

If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right.  But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers.  For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.  For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker (James 2:8-11).

The “royal law” is “the law belonging to the king.”  “Love your neighbor as yourself.”  No need for James to identify “your neighbor.”  It’s both rich man and poor, straight and gay.  In God’s eyes, neither holds an advantage.   Break this “royal law” of the King and you incur guilt.

Therefore, James prods the people  . . .

Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom, because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment!  (2:12,13).

” . . . the law that gives freedom” is God’s Old Testament Law as fulfilled in Christ, marked by mercy and summarized in “love your neighbor as yourself”.   That’s the law, says James, by which you will be judged.  But remember this and tremble:  ” . . . judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful.”  But rejoice:  for the merciful man, “Mercy triumphs over judgment.”

The lesson is written in red:  Don’t evaluate people by the world’s standards.  Mercifully love, especially the one you presume doesn’t deserve it.

* * * * *

“O God with whom there is no partiality, may I mark off a ‘discrimination-free zone’ wherever I am.  Help me remember I’d be rejected except for your mercy in Christ.  May I show mercy to those I’m apt to condemn.  And, thereby, may they come to know your mercy.  If I’m to err, may it be, not on the  judgment-side, but the mercy-side.   Empower me to live by the love-law of my King.  In his name I pray.  Amen.                                            


Radical Islamist Ideology

P.AllanPerhaps today we should just “weep with those who weep” in Orlando.  Or maybe we should be urged to weep, because by tomorrow or Wednesday for most of us the slaughter’s horror will have dissipated.  Mass shootings have become almost commonplace.  And the investigative accounts of the killer’s identity, family life, motivation, etc. seem the same old story.

I listened to President Obama, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, as well as a few “lesser” politicians comment.  Sadly familiar.  If ever a sign that we live in a fallen, evil world, this is it—not just the shootings, but the responses.  Know the identity of the politician before he or she speaks, you know what he or she will say.  We call it “politics”; but it really is ideology.  (“A system of ideas and ideals, especially one that forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy”–Oxford Dictionaries).

The ideologues who theorize guns are the problem push for tougher (“common sense”) gun laws.  Those who theorize our defense is insufficient push for banning Muslims from the country or stronger police presence.  I’m not qualified to speak  specifically on any of these “pushes.”  I do agree with the mostly unheard voices who argue that Radical Islam is at war with America—except I would add, “and at war with the non-Sharia Muslim world.

When Jesus predicted, “And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars” (Matthew 24:6), I understand him to mean that generation leading up to 70 A.D. when Rome finally crushed Jerusalem.  But I also take him to mean “double fulfillment”; that is, wars as part of “birth pains” (Matthew 24:8) will mark these last days leading up to the Last Day.  And, though far different from the tactics of our two world wars, Jesus certainly included this Radical Islamist war.

In World War 2, Hitler held an ideology—broadly, the superiority of the Aryan race.  We beat it with bombs, as today’s war necessitates.  But understanding the enemy and his ideology is necessary too.  How can we not realize our attackers are not “lone wolves” or “isolated crazies”?  Radical Islam intends, in the name of Allah, to take over the world.  Tightening airport security will not defeat demonic worldview.

“The Clarion Project” (http://www.clarionproject.org/understanding-islamism/islamic-extremismprovides an informative introduction to Radical Islam Ideology . . .

Islamic extremism is driven by an interpretation of Islam that believes that Islamic law, or sharia, is an all-encompassing religious-political system. Since it is believed to be proscribed by Allah (Arabic for “God”) sharia must be enforced in the public sphere by a global Islamic state. As such, Islamic extremists consider it to be the only truly legitimate form of governance and reject democracy and human rights values.

Thus, the ultimate objective of Islamic extremists is the merger of “mosque and state” under sharia law. Those who favor such an approach are called Islamists. Their ideology is called Islamism, or political Islam.

(Photo: © Reuters)(Photo: © Reuters)

Islamic extremists believe they are obligated to install this form of governance in Muslim-majority territories, countries and, eventually, the entire world. In the minds of Islamic extremists, they are promoting justice and freedom by instituting sharia.

In some cases, Islamic extremists even describe sharia as a superior form of “democracy.”

Islamic extremists have intermediate political goals which they believe will pave the way for the global implementation of sharia. One of these goals is the removal of non-Muslim military forces from Muslim lands and the overthrow of “enemy” regimes.

Acts of Islamic extremism includes terrorism, human rights abuses, the advancement of sharia-based governance, bigotry towards non-Muslims and rival Muslims and overall hostility to the West and, in particular, Western democracy.

Today we “weep with those who weep”, despite our conviction that the Bible calls homosexual behavior sin.  These are men and women created in God’s image, and our response to them should be brokenhearted prayer, not condemnation.  Our plea for them should be for God’s grace in Christ, as we ourselves continue to need.

It’s also apparently true that most Muslims are not radical extremists, just as not all Christians are abortion-doctor killers or homophobic.

That brings us to how as Jesus-followers we should respond.  We can’t defeat terrorists bent on destroying us.  We can’t out-debate their ideology.  (Though we—here meaning our political leaders—must realize this is a war against an ideology whose adherents mean, in Allah’s name, to take over the world.)

What we can do, what we must do, is pray.  Though written in a different context, the apostle Paul’s words apply . . .

For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does.
The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world.
On the contrary, they have divine power to demolish strongholds.
We demolish arguments and every pretension
that sets itself up against the knowledge of God,
and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.
(2 Corinthians 10:3-5)

Therefore put on the full armor of God,
so that when the day of evil comes,
you may be able to stand your ground,
and after you have done everything, to stand.
Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist,
with the breastplate of righteousness in place,
and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace.
In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith,
with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.
Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit,
which is the word of God.
And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests.
(Ephesians 6:13-18a)

Does it seem  absurd to believe that our little prayers can affect how God works in the world?  Remember . . .

The prayer of a righteous person
has great power as it is working.
(James 5:16b)

Do What God’s Word Says

O PreacherI listen to God’s word like a couch potato.  (Do potatoes listen?)   Well, I don’t always listen that way.  But too often I listen without a mind to do it.  Which is what James warns against . . .

 Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says [For] Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like a man who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like (James 1:22-24). 

Hard words.  Especially given the occasion.  James’ Jewish Christian readers have been dispersed among the nations.  Some driven from their homes by persecutors.  Some living in foreign lands.  Many, I think, simply seeking  solitude in their homes repeating life-saving Gospel to themselves.  But, James warns,  hearing alone is self-deceptive.  “Do what it says.”  (The Greek verb tense implies “Keep giving yourself to do what it says.”)  An ongoing way of life, not merely an occasional obedience.

If we listen without doing the word our pastor preaches, we deceive ourselves.  Why is listening-without-doing self-deceptive?  James explains it’s like a quick look in the mirror, then forgetting what you look like.  I’m always far more handsome in my mind than in my mirror.   In the same way, James explains, if we don’t do the word we hear, we presume we’ve got it.

For example:  “Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of many kinds . . . ” (1:2).  If I hear my pastor preach it, but don’t “chew” it over in my mind and start practicing it, I’ll forget it.  The word won’t affect my attitude or action.  And, instead of revealing Jesus-in-me, I’ll show others my sin-nature.

But the man who looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues to do this, not forgetting what he has heard, but doing it– he will be blessed in what he does (James 1:25).

Contrasted with the mere hearer is “the man who looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues to do this . . . ”  No cursory look, an intent one.  The Greek is parakupto.  Luke uses it of Peter, who “rose and ran to [Jesus’] tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen cloths . . . ” (Luke 24:12).  An investigative study longing to see his Lord.   Nor does the intent-looker forget because he starts to put into practice the word heard.

Now:  what is this “perfect law that gives freedom” (literally, “the perfect law of liberty”)?   It’s the Law of Moses—the only law these Jewish Christians know.  The mention of “law” demands comment, since we’ve learned from Galatians  that “by works of the law no one will be justified” (Galatians 2:16). 

Comment #1:  God’s moral law (not ceremonial or dietary) remains in place.  Murder and adultery are transgressions.  No other gods before God remains the rule.

Comment #2:   Jesus fulfilled God’s Law.  (“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:27).  Therefore, he is the believer’s righteousness before God—one reason James calls this “the law of liberty.”

Comment #3:  The righteous requirement of the law is being fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit (Romans 8:4).  The Spirit enables us to progressively “walk” (like little children)  in God’s good, perfect and righteous law—a second reason why God’s law now gives freedom.

Comment #4  The one who does God’s law is promised heavenly happiness.  ” . . . he will be blessed in what he does.”

James sums up this section of his letter by driving home applications about what he’s urged . . .

If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not keep a tight rein on his tongue, he deceives himself and his religion is worthless. Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world (1:26,27).

To James (and thus to our Lord) words are consequential.  Therefore, our tongue (!) plays a far-reaching role, even (especially) in our culture where words are “cheap” because indiscriminately, often thoughtlessly, spouted.  Tight-reign the tongue!

Suppose, dear Jewish Christian reader, you are scrupulous about keeping the Sabbath holy and avoiding meat sacrificed to idols, but your unreigned tongue curses your neighbor?  All your scrupulous devotion to your religion is worth nothing!

Furthermore, dear Jewish Christian,  pure and undefiled religion in God’s eyes is what you may not consider “religion” at all:  caring for orphans and widows in their troubles and keeping yourself unstained from this fallen world.  In your dispersion and persecution many opportunities will arise for you to offer this care.  So will the danger of your becoming friends with this world (see James 4:4) and, thus, morally polluted by its corrupted ways.

* * * *

Far-removed from us is all this, no?  No!  How prone we are to hear God’s word with no mind to do it!  How ignorant of God’s word we are, not because we don’t hear sermons and read Bibles, but because our default position is to gather biblical information instead of pursuing biblical obedience.  The heavenly happiness that comes from doing what God says is too often absent from our lives, while we pursue happiness in wealth and possessions.  And, finally, perhaps we should fear near-perfect Sunday worship performances in favor of caring for the needy while staying free from the world’s moral pollution.

Help us, O God, to be better doers of your word
and not hearers only.

           

God the Tempter?

O PreacherIn the 1970s comedian Flip Wilson provoked laughs:  “The devil made me do it.”  In the mid-40s A.D. Jewish Christians provoked  correction from James with:  “God made me do it!”

James. leader of the Jerusalem church, is writing to Jewish Christians dispersed by persecution among the nations.  He reminds them of God’s character and their own sinful nature, calling them to morally upright living in a hostile world.  He begins with a promised blessing . . .

Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him (1:12).   James knows his readers are “under trial” (payrasmos), potentially persecuted for their faith.  But persecutors haven’t gained the upper hand; the devil hasn’t grabbed dominion.  This is a God-test.   And James promises the test-stander “will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him.”

In the Greek games, at the start-line athletes poise.  The signal sounds.  For the finish they sprint all-out.   A head-wreath for the winner—the conqueror’s crown  So, promises James, endure the trial, stand the test.  At the end you’ll be crowned with eternal life.  What more motivation do Christ-believers need?

“Love” is an interesting term here, don’t you think?  James didn’t write, ” . . . promised to those who believe in him” or ” . . . to those who obey him” but ” . . . to those who love him.”  The Greek is agapooin.  Not merely love as a feeling, but love as a matter of will and action.  Not a husband bringing flowers home, but remaining faithful when tempted by a younger woman.  Not a wife kissing her husband, but caring for him in his poor health.

When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone; but each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed.  Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death. (1:13-15).

I’m most prey to temptation when tired or stressed.  Not surprising, then, that these dispersed and persecuted Jewish Christians would be tempted.  But why blame God?  Because God is sovereign in this trial/test, and they’re being tempted to sin.  God must be the ultimate tempter.  Or, like the ancient Israelites in the desert, blame God, Moses, Aaron, anybody but themselves.

Don’t say it, James demands.  Why?  Because, as James Adamson writes in The Epistle of James, “Tempting others to evil, would require a delight in evil, of which [God] in himself is incapable.”  God’s “tempting” is actually a test in which, unlike the devil,  he wants the believer to succeed!  God entices no one to sin.

What, then, are temptation’s sources?  ” . . . each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed.”

Brock Turner, a Stanford University student, was recently found guilty of sexual assault (and received an unbelievably unjust six-month jail sentence).  Turner  blamed the female victim, blamed alcohol and blamed an unfamiliar-to-him permissive college environment.  Not only did he not repent; he refused to accept any responsibility.

James rejects such arrogance.  It’s our morally evil desire that hooks and drags us off.  Young man sees a drunken, desirable young woman.  He’s hooked.  His desire explodes with lust and births the act of sin.  Make no mistake:  when this becomes life’s pattern, it ends in death apart from God.

Don’t be deceived, my dear brothers.  Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.  He chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all he created (1:16-18).

Echoing the prophet’s words (“The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it?—Jeremiah 17:9), James warns Jewish Christians not to be deceived.  Not by their own sinful heart, nor by scheming Satan.  God gives good and perfect gifts, not evil ones to hook you on your lusts.

He is ” . . . the Father of heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.”  So Adamson comments:  “God’s benevolence is like a light which cannot be extinguished, eclipsed, or ‘shadowed out’ . . . The light of the sun may be blocked, for example, by some material object, so as to cast a shadow:  indeed, for a time in an eclipse, the direct light of the sun . . . may be shut off from the observer.  Nothing like that can block God’s light, interrupt the flow of his goodness, or put us ‘in shadow,’ so that we are out of the reach of his ‘radiance” (The Epistles of James). 

Look what goodness and perfection he has poured out!  He willed to give us [new] birth through the word of truth (the Gospel of Jesus Christ).”  A new start!  A do-over, this time with Spirit-power!  And what does James explain is God’s purpose in rebirth?
” . . . that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all he created.”  Despite dispersion and distress, these Jewish Christians are the first of a multitude like the sea’s sand who will be rebirthed and brought to complete perfection one day (James 1:2-4).  Therefore . . .

My dear brothers, take note of this:  Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry,  for man’s anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires.  Therefore, get rid of all moral filth and the evil that is so prevalent and humbly accept the word planted in you, which can save you (1:19-21).

Because they are God’s “firstfruits” living among unbelieving opponents, they must live morally upright lives—especially with their tongue.  Be quick listeners.  Be slow speakers.  Be slow temper-tantrum-ers.  (How hard in a world where we’re bombarded  with voices and long for someone to hear us!)  But believers (them and us) mustn’t react to hardships and frustrations with angry words,  because anger corrupts the righteous life God wants.

Moral manure and unbridled evil—get rid of it!  Like stinking clothes, strip it off!   Instead, welcome God’s Word implanted by memory and the Spirit in you.  It’s there, a grace-truth “invasion” of your fallen nature.  Embrace it.  Believe it!  Do it!  And on the Last Day, unlike sin which corrupts you forever, it can save you!

NOT GOD’S HAND!

<b>Temptation</b> Is Not Sin | Transformed

WHAT WILL I DO?

 

With the Lord in Joyful Song

P.AllanCame across this video.  Got blessed.  Couldn’t not praise the Lord and celebrate his faithful love and goodness.  I thought, “Why not pass it along?”  So here it is, no charge.  It may not be your favorite style of music.  (What’s wrong with you?)  But, ff you need to be encouraged, if you need to rejoice in Jesus, I pray this will help.  (It’s OK to clap and sing along . . . )

Happy When It Hurts

O PreacherKidding, right?  Happy when it hurts?  That’s pretty much what James urged . . .

“Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds” (James 1:2). 

Sounds like “be happy when it hurts” to me!  But I’m getting ahead of myself.  Let’s start at the start . . .

James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, To the twelve tribes (in the Dispersion) scattered among the nations: Greetings (1:1).  James was Jesus’ brother.   After Jesus’ resurrection, James  became leader of the 1st century A.D. Jewish Christian church in Jerusalem.

He’s writing  to “the twelve tribes scattered among the nations” (1:1).   The NIV translates (and interprets) diaspora  “scattered among.”  The term diaspora hearkens back to the Babylonian exile (587 B.C.).  When it ended (583 B.C.), many Jews remained in Babylon.  Five hundred years later, Jews had scattered as well to Persia, Cyprus, the Aegean islands, the west coast of Asia Minor, Egypt, and Rome.  To them, James is writing with apostolic authority, prophetic power and pastoral care.

“Scattered among” reminds me of us.  Jesus’ followers today are a holy nation, without country or capital, dispersed like   ” , , , strangers and aliens in the world” (1 Peter 2:11).  So we can identify with James’ readers.  Similarly, like them in this world, we , “face trials of many kinds” . . .

Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance 1:2,3).

Payrasmois (my phonetic Greek!) is translated “trials, tests, temptations.”  Of these. James’ readers face “many kinds.”  Thus, James B. Admanson in his The Epistle of James says payrasmois includes all kinds of adversity and affliction, as diverse as disease, sexual lust, greed, temper, pride of wealth or strength or beauty.  It is characteristic of James,” he writes, “that here he powerfully uses payrasmois for both the pleasant allurements of Satan and the painful afflictions of the body . . . ”

Now:  why does James urge us to respond to payrasmois with “pure joy”?  (Got to admit.  If trials are tests which I should count an occasion for joy, my score is abysmal.)  Joy, because James is telling us implicitly God is at work for good in them.  We’re not having “a bad day.”  It’s not just “a bummer” or “bad luck.” Trials are “the testing of [our] faith.”

I aced most college tests.  High school, not so much.  At test times in both places, though, my stomach knotted and palms sweated.  The test would examine me.  I’d be evaluated by how I answered.  James is saying, “No stomach knots.  No sweaty palms.  Count this test all joy.”  Before we dig more deeply into “joy”, let’s see specifically why James calls for joy.

 ” . . . because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance.  Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything (1:3,4). 

” . . . the testing of your faith develops (produces, brings about) perseverance.”  “Develops” implies ongoing process, not quick pill.  It’s the difference between popping a steroid and working out.  BibleWorks computer program offers a profound definition for “perseverance”—“the characteristic of a man or woman who is not swerved from his/her deliberate purpose and loyalty to faith and piety by even the greatest trials and suffering.”

Years ago I used to jog/  (Never considering it pure joy!  Had to get in/stay in shape!)  My toughest challenge hit just short of half-way.  I was starting to ache.  Getting winded.  Thinking, “I’ve got another whole half to go!”  I needed to endure, to not swerve from my purpose of finishing the course even though I hurt.

God obviously values upomonay.  Perseverance–patient endurance–is a virtue he considers necessary for us sinners-saved-by-grace to be “mature (teleeoi–perfect, full-grown) and complete (olokayros–whole, complete in all parts), lacking nothing. ”  Maturity or completeness—that’s God’s goal for us.  Perseverance through faith-testing trials is the way.  And the only path to developing perseverance is persevering.

Frankly, when I’m hurting my default reaction is to not hurt.  I’m not much interested in enduring on to maturity.  I just want to feel better.  Give me a miracle-healing, God!  But God’s got an alternate agenda.  He wants to make us more like Christ.  Isn’t that what Paul wrote?

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him,
who have been called according to his purpose.  For those God foreknew
he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son,
that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.
(Romans 8:28,29).

Our (at least my) reaction to faith-testing trials is “Get me outta here!” and not “Give me grace to endure so I can be mature!”  Therefore, James admonishes and promises . . .

If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God,
who gives generously to all without finding fault,
and it will be given to him.
(James 1:5)

Wisdom is ours for the asking!  Now, briefly back to “joy” . . .

“Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds” (James 1:2).

James is not urging us to shout “Hooray!” when we hurt.  My title, “Happy When It Hurts”, misses the mark.  James is counseling us to wisely see the great good God is doing in faith-testing trials as we live dispersed in this world.  And to consider that gracious work of God an occasion for pure joy.

* * * * *

Father in heaven, you know well how I react to trials and tests. especially when they drag on with no apparent hope of rescue.  I know James’ admonitions and promises here.  But I need more than knowledge.  I need wisdom.  Please generously and ungrudgingly give me wisdom from above by the Holy Spirit.  Enable me to see beyond the hurt to the maturity and completeness you’re developing in me.  So shall I be satisfied with your transforming work.  May I persevere with joy, assured that you are saving me to be a creature more complete than I can now imagine.  All glory is yours.  In the name of your Son who endured for me, Amen.

 

 

 

 

The Holy Spirit and Me

O PreacherHaving clearly road-mapped my future blogging  (https://theoldpreacher.com/explain-james/) , I’m abruptly turning down an unexpected side road . . .

Christian Titles.

I’ve never paid much mind to Christian titles, whether denominational (Baptist, Presbyterian, Assemblies of God, etc.) or theological (Arminian, Reformed, amillennial, etc.)  They sometimes categorize unfairly.  Like: every Baptist is like every other Baptist and so on.)  As far as the theological groupings, (as I’ve said before), I think they all have to twist certain texts to fit their systems.  I suspect when we see Jesus we’ll all realize we were a little wrong.

For that reason, I’ve never been big on systematic theology.  In 44 years of preaching and teaching, I’ve primarily focused on the text at hand, trying to read it as much as possible as the original readers would have, and hopefully close to what the author intended.

My Story.

I was raised, and originally ordained, in an Assemblies of God church.  I have a Pentecostal heritage. (Note: I don’t hold to all the A/G tenets of faith.)   Neither time nor space allows me to fully define Pentecostalism nor relate its history.  (Google “Pentecostalism” and find plenty.)  To some, Pentecostal conjures up images of people falling on the floor or barking like dogs or prophesying the future.  While sadly those images are based on fact, that’s not the Pentecostalism I grew up in.  Yes, being baptized in the Spirit with “the initial physical evidence of speaking in other tongues” was emphasized, occasionally overly.  But, by and large, the manifestations of the Spirit’s gifts were kept within biblical bounds.  More than gifts, Pentecostalism meant, at least for me,  a rich presence of God the Holy Spirit, a personal experience with him that reached deeper inward than the mind alone.

In later years of pastoring, I was progressively drawn to Reformed theology (Calvinism).  It answered many questions, but gave rise to others.  Again, I won’t give details, except to say it remains a vital part of the theological foundation of my faith.  Now I find Charismatic (a so-called “second wave” Pentecostalism) Reformed folks, Sam Storms, for one  (http://www.samstorms.com/enjoying-god-blog).  I’m not sure I fit comfortably in that camp either.  But I do know in my limited experience I have missed the sense of God’s empowering presence (to use Gordon Fee’s term) among the Reformed.  (As I’ve said, none of us has it all right!)

So now in my “retired” years, without letting go of the good Reformed theology provides, I find part of my heart returning to some of my Pentecostal heritage.   I have recently quoted Dr. Gordon Fee, an American-Canadian Christian theologian and an ordained minister of the Assemblies of God (USA). He currently serves as Professor Emeritus of New Testament Studies at Regent College, Vancouver, British Columbia.

God’s Empowering Presence.

I recently came across the following from Dr. Fee in his book, Listening to the Spirit in the Text ( https://www.amazon.com/Listening-Spirit-Text-Gordon-Fee-ebook/dp/B003U6Z63M?ie=UTF8&keywords=listening%20to%20the%20spirit%20in%20the%20text&qid=1465236726&ref_=sr_1_1&s=bookssr=1-1I include it here because I’ve written recently about God the Holy Spirit in Galatians.  Fee’s  words profoundly spoke to me.  To them, my heart said, “Amen!”

Product Details                                                                                                              

” . . . I began to think of my own Pentecostal heritage (that is, Fee’s), and how we have depersonalized the Spirit–not in our theology itself, mind you, but in our ways of thinking and talking about the Spirit.  Our speech is what betrays us.  With us the Spirit is depersonalized into an empowering experience.  We are empowered by the experience, but not by the empowering presence of God himself.  And then I thought of my lifelong existence in evangelical circles–where the Spirit is kept safely in the creed and the liturgy.  He is personal, well enough.  We would be unorthodox to think otherwise.  But for many, he is anything but God’s empowering presence.  Our images are biblical, but they are also impersonal.  He is wind, fire, water–comes to us as an influence, or whatever.  But he is not the one in whom and by whom we are sharing in the very love and grace and life of God himself.  And I do not mean in some mystical way.  Our problem is that the language of Father and Son evokes personal images; but the Spirit evokes that which is intangible, not quite real, because incorporeal (immaterial, ethereal). Paul’s prayer on the other hand (“The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all”–2 Corinthians 13,14), is that they might know the grace of Christ, the visible historical expression of the love of God, because as people of the Spirit they live in constant, empowering fellowship with God himself.  This is how the loving God and gracious Lord Jesus Christ are now present with us” (p. 29).

This, whatever our theological stripe, I pray for us all.

 

 

Explain James

O PreacherMartin Luther, seminal figure in the Protestant Reformation (16th century Europe) admitted, ” . . . there is many a good saying in [the Book of James], but it contradicts St. Paul and all other Scripture in giving righteousness to works.”

Contradictions?

Luther’s judgement raises serious question, some beyond scope of this blog.  Here’s one we can ask:   Did God the Holy Spirit inspire two men (Paul and James) to write contradictory documents?  It almost seems so.  Fairness demands we dig out answers,  especially since we’ve just come from Galatians where Paul categorically claimed, ” . . . we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ” (Galatians 2:16).  While James wrote, “You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone” (James 2:24).

We’ll confront this “contradiction”, as we turn next to the New Testament Book of James.  Why James?   A word of explanation as suggested by my wife.  (She’s the one to the left in the first photo above.  It doesn’t do her justice.)

Reason.

I love my wife with all my heart.  She is God’s most precious gift to me after Jesus.  She is God-loving, full of faith, a warrior in prayer, one of the hardest workers I know, wise, and beautiful inside and out.  She was the rock in our early-marriage years when I was too immature to be married.  She’s my caregiver now in our late-married years when my health is poor.  She recently suggested, “You really better explain where you’re going with your blog.”  I (being no fool myself) decided to listen.

Last April 1st I started the “Acts Eight” series, discussing the eight sermons and talks found in that book.  I quickly realized I needed to review the narratives leading up to each for the “sermons” to  make sense.  Hence, the “Acts Eight” became a walk through the entire book.

Well, not quite.  When Paul was about to begin his second missionary journey, I remembered that  it was about then he composed his letter to the Galatians.  So, I decided we should study that then.  Now my plan is to walk through the New Testament chronologically.  Which means we step now from Galatians to James, since both were written about the same time though, of course,  by different authors and to different readers

To mix things even more, I’ve occasionally blogged topics that struck my interest or seemed timely.  I’ll continue that as we wind our way through the New Testament.   All things considered, I may not live long enough to reach Revelation.  Which is okay for two reasons.  One, it’s a very confusing book.  And, two, by that time I’ll be with Jesus and it won’t matter.

 James.

Scholars are split.  Was James Jesus’ brother?

“Isn’t this the carpenter?
Isn’t this Mary’s son and the brother of James, Joseph, Judas and Simon?
Aren’t his sisters here with us?”
(Mark 6:3)

Or half-brother?  Mary’s husband, Joseph, quickly disappears from the Gospel narrative.  It’s assumed, therefore, that he died.  If Mary remarried (supposition), and James was a product of their union, he would have been Jesus’ half-brother.

The scholar-split is actually three ways.  Some believe James was Jesus’ cousin.  Roman Catholic scholars are among those who especially hold this view, believing Mary was always a virgin.  I see no support for this view.

Why the family-tree discussion?  James didn’t believe in Jesus.

Nearing Jesus’ crucifixion, Jesus’ brothers challenged him to go to Judea “that your disciples also may see the works you are doing . . . If you do these things, show yourself to the world” (John 7:4b).   John then explains their motivation . . .

For not even his brothers believed in him (John 7:5).

How was that possible?  Brotherly rivalry?  Jealousy?  Or just incredulity?  “My brother?  Messiah?  Ya gotta be kidding.  Do you see how he leaves his room?”

But when we meet James in his writing, he is . . .

“James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ”
(James 1:1)

Why the conversion?

“Christ . . . was raised on the third day . . . and . . .
he appeared . . .  to James . . . “
(1 Corinthians 15:4-7).

Fun to have been there, no?  “Oh, Jesus, I really knew it all the time.  It was the rest of the family that didn’t believe.  I always knew you were special.”  I imagine Jesus flashed a small smile, said nothing, and just bore loving eyes into his brother’s embarrassed face.

Paper 192 – APPEARANCES IN GALILEE - OPAD - One Page A Day - Urantia ...

From years of unbelief, by impact of Jesus’ resurrection, James went on to become the most influential leader of the church in Jerusalem (Acts 15:13).

Us.

What about us?  Maybe our beginnings—even to today—have been without God.  Or with him,  but just ordinary.  But God-less or ordinary life given into the hands of the risen Lord can be made holy and extraordinary for his saving purposes!  Just remember James.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 The Old Preacher

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)