The Old Preacher

Viewing the World through God's Word

Page 42 of 76

Leftist Religion: No Peace

P.AllanI’m astounded that the current administration in Washington seems to believe that getting America’s enemies to the diplomatic table will bring peace.  Just to be clear, I’m not making a political statement.  I’m not pro-war.  And I have no workable solution to bring world peace through human channels.

But this naiveté  of inherent human goodness totally ignores the reality of sin . . .

“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God'”
( Romans 3:23).

Sin not only separates us from our Creator and his glory, it depraves human nature, including our mind.  Writing of Gentile sinners, Paul urges the church . . .

” . . . you must no longer walk as the Gentiles do in the futility of their minds.
They are darkened in their understanding,
alienated from the life of God,
because of
the ignorance that is in them
due to the hardness of their heart.”
(Ephesians 4:17,18).

That’s God’s word.  It means we cannot simply trust “the goodwill of man” when we sit at the bargaining table.  I don’t deny the need for diplomacy.  Sure, try to reason with people driven by hostile ideologies.  But we can’t assume that a signature on the bottom line certifies the agreement.

And that brings me to the importance of worldview.  In the latest edition of “National Review” online, Ben Shapiro writes . . .

Obama believes, as doctrinaire leftists do, that human beings do not derive meaning from ancient religious superstitions and deep-seated ideas about how the universe ought to operate. Given relief from material want and prevention of emotional distress, Obama believes, all human beings would get along just fine — and would then be free to cultivate themselves as they see fit.
Karl Marx wrote that “life involves before everything else eating and drinking, a habitation, clothing, and many other things.” In this view, unhappiness derives from scarcity in these resources or from social relationships created to guarantee these primary needs for some at the expense of others. Religion, meanwhile, exists only to misdirect such unhappiness toward the cosmic rather than toward one’s fellow man. Hence Marx’s belief that abolition of religion is “the demand for their real happiness.”

(Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436632/obama-trump-radical-islam?utm_source=NR&utm_medium=satemail&utm_campaign=June17shapiro)

This is “leftist religion.”  The replacement of “ancient religious superstitions” with a religious-like ideology that what we all really need is our “primary needs” supplied.  If we would only help our fellow man attain those provisions we would have world happiness and peace.  (ISIS reveals that worldview’s paucity when they aim to take over the world by slaughter!)

Our “leftist religionists” stop short of Marx who claimed “Religion . . . exists only to misdirect such unhappiness toward the cosmic rather than toward one’s fellow man.”  In other words, energy devoted to getting right with God should be directed to getting right with one another.  Today’s “leftists” allow for God, just not as Savior and Lord through his Son.  Leave him, please, to just “bless” us.

“Leftist religion” will never deliver, nor will diplomacy based on it.  God won’t be content to be merely a “blesser.”  He will be honored as God!  Belief in the inherent goodness of man, if only his primary needs are met, is blind and ignorant faith stemming from hard-hearted-ness toward God the Father of Jesus.  The world cannot be saved by mutual goodwill and understanding, because the foundation (man) is fallen.

This is why our only hope lies not in a new U.S. president or deal-making Congress or more talented diplomats or even the military’s overpowering force.  These are necessities for today—until the Peacemaker returns to Planet Earth . . .

But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away
have been brought near through the blood of Christ.
For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one
and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility,
by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations.
His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two,
thus making peace,
and in this one body to reconcile both of them to God
through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility.

He came and preached peace to you who were far away
and peace to those who were near.
For through him we both have access to the Father by one Spirit.
(Ephesians 2:13-18)

Now, until that day when Jesus comes to bring world peace,
drink in his Spirit of peace for your own soul
as you prayerfully listen to the video above. 

Tongue-Taming

O PreacherI was 18 when Lois and I married—and immature.  My tongue spewed it in arguments.  Not curses.  Insensitive,  harsh, and callous words, impossible to take back.  Heart surgery may be more urgent, but James claims tongue-taming may be more critical . . .

Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly.  We all stumble in many ways. If anyone is never at fault in what he says, he is a perfect man, able to keep his whole body in check (James 3:1,2).

Hear ye, every prospective Bible college and seminary student, every Bible study leader and Sunday school teacher, every Christian parent!  Caution!  Tremble!  Because “the tongue . . . is a restless evil, full of deadly poison” (3:8).  Because “ . . . we who teach will be judged more strictly” (3:1).  And because only a perfect person never sins with his words (3:2).  If that person could, he’d be able to keep his whole body from sin.  Such is the tongue’s deadly threat.

James issues this warning to Jewish Christians dispersed among the nations, probably trying to protect them from false teachings from without and unqualified teachers from within.  They’re suffering trials (1:2) and mustn’t fall prey like dumb sheep to hungry wolves.  Nor must they wound one another with their false or foolish words.  Neither must we.

When we put bits into the mouths of horses to make them obey us, we can turn the whole animal. Or take ships as an example. Although they are so large and are driven by strong winds, they are steered by a very small rudder wherever the pilot wants to go. Likewise the tongue is a small part of the body, but it makes great boasts. Consider what a great forest is set on fire by a small spark. The tongue also is a fire, a world of evil among the parts of the body. It corrupts the whole person, sets the whole course of his life on fire, and is itself set on fire by hell (James 3:3-6).

James sounds tongue-obsessed.   Such a small organ!  But think of the bridle’s bit.  Not big.  Put In a thousand-pound horse’s mouth, it “can turn the whole animal.”  Only strong winds can drive a sailing ship through the sea.  Yet it needs only “a very small rudder” to direct it.  So our little tongue proudly wags sparking far-reaching devastation—for hearers and speaker alike.   An evil word (from heresy to jealousy) “corrupts the whole person” and “sets the whole course of his life on fire”, because his words’ source lies in hell itself.

“Whoa, James.  Little over the top, no?”  Well, think of a politician suspected of sexual immorality.  Guilty, but  he defends himself with a lie.  New questions arise; a second concocted.  More suspicions arise.  He lies a new one.  No conclusive evidence, but after months of lies, his career is in the can.  James might say,  “That’s the power of the tiny tongue!”  We Christians have even more at stake—the integrity of our Lord and his Gospel.  And, we’ll have to give account for every word.  “But I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken “(Matthew 12:36, Jesus).

All kinds of animals, birds, reptiles and creatures of the sea are being tamed and have been tamed by man, but no man can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison.  With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in God’s likeness.  Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers, this should not be.  Can both fresh water and salt water flow from the same spring? My brothers, can a fig tree bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Neither can a salt spring produce fresh water (James 3:7-12).

No man can tame the tongue?  Really?  It can’t be subdued or domesticated like wild animals on the new earth (Isaiah 11:6,9)?  Is is really an unstable, uncontrollable evil full of death”? 

At a particular elders meeting one elder voiced a decision that ticked me off.  Angry words exploded from my mouth. Instead of calming the situation, I had inflamed it.  Or, to continue James’ metaphor, instead of speaking healing life into a serious situation, I spoke poisonous death.  Later, I had to humbly ask forgiveness.  James’ tongue-description is sadly accurate.

The tongue I used that evening to angrily criticize my made-in-God’s-image brother in Christ was the same tongue I’d used a few days earlier to praise God in corporate worship.  O Father!  “Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing.”  It’s not right!  It mustn’t happen!  It violates God’s creation (and new creation) order.  The same spring can’t produce both fresh and salt water.  A fig tree can’t bear olives.  A grapevine can’t bear figs.  It’s abnormal, deviant, perverse.  Sometimes, according to James, I am.

*****

Because as pastor I taught God’s word for 44 years, I will be judged more strictly (James 3:1).  So will you if you’ve preached or taught Bible studies, Sunday school, or your own children.  It’s a terrifying thought, tempered only by the good news that God’s mercy will triumph over his judgment, if we have shown mercy to others (James 3:12,13).

The culprit in this scenario is our tongue.  In 3:8 James warns that it’s “evil and uncontrollable, full of deadly poison”, unable to be tamed by us.  Which is why, it appears, he leaves us in 3:1-12 with no hope of bridling it.  Yet in 1:26, he suggest it is possible to control that wagging hunk of flesh:  “If anyone does not control his tongue, his religion is worthless and he deceives himself.”  Not tame the wild-tongue-horse, but bridle
it so you control the animal.

So it’s all on us, then?  Thankfully, not at all.  James offers divine help when he writes of “the wisdom from above” (3;17).  Here, then, is what I infer we can do.  Pray for wisdom from above concerning what we say with our tongue.  God has promised to give it (James 1:5).  This is God’s part in tongue-bridling.

Be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry (James 1:19).  This is our part.  As Ben Franklin says in Poor Richard’s Almanac, “it is better to be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.”

Cute—at this age!

 

funny tongue photo: tongue tied tonguetied.jpg

But real soon—need the knot!

Laugh

O PreacherI can’t believe Jesus didn’t laugh at this.  Well, I did anyway.  Nothing theological about it.  Nothing spiritual.  Just very funny.  If you haven’t seen it, I hope it brings a grin to your face and a little happiness to your day.  (I think we’ll laugh at lot on the new earth. So let’s practice now.)

Blaming Christians

O PreacherI’m almost speechless.  Please read this article by David French from the “National Review.”  It’s his response to Jen Hatmaker’s viral Facebook page (link in article).

 we need the Holy Spirit to produce the fruit of Christ-like love in us, even while we call sin what it is!

The Orlando Shooting Launches a War on Christianity

Somehow, Omar Mateen’s massacre has put American Christians on the defensive.
By David French — June 15, 2016

Fatal Faith

O PreacherI woke up in a strange land.  A dangerous, decaying city where dark eyes stared threats wherever I turned.  I knew no one.  Nor the language.  Nor where to go.  On a narrow street a dark giant approached.  I cowered.  But, in my own tongue, he offered to get me home.  “You can trust me.  Just do what I tell you.”  This is the nature of James’ faith.  Faith that follows the one trusted.  Faith that transcends words and evidenced in action.

What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no works? Can such faith save him? (James 2:14).

Well,  can’t it save him, Paul?  ” . . . a person is not justified by works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ” (Galatians 2:16).    Confronted with a classic contradiction.  James asks rhetorically  No good comes from faith without works.  No more than . . .

If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?” (James 2:15,16).

Another rhetorical.  Words won’t warm chilled bones or fill empty stomachs.

So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead (James 2:17).

“Dead” faith.  Opposite of “alive.”  Opposite of “useful, effective.”  Faith that can’t save, not the naked nor the hungry nor the sinner.  Useless because it’s lifeless.

Proper to pause here.  Typically, we read this passage in theological terms only.  We feel pressed to answer: How shall we solve the doctrinal conundrum between Paul and James?  Not an unworthy question, to be sure.  James, though, is writing as a concerned pastor.  He’s anxious that his dispersed Jewish Christians may not be acting consistently with their profession of faith in Christ.

This is where James speaks to us.  Faith-professions have become “easy-believism.”   Occasionally observing unseemly behavior, a friend remarks,  “And she’s a Christian?”  To borrow a term from German pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, faith that doesn’t show itself in action is cheap, just as grace that doesn’t “work.”

“Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession, absolution without personal confession. Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate” (Bonhoeffer).

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.  You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that– and shudder (James 2:18,19).

“Someone” seems to have gotten his challenge backward.  I’d expect him to say, “You have deed; I have faith.”  Confusing.  But Jame’s argument is clear enough—and hits with a harsh, blunt blow.  Intellectual faith (faith that believes that there is one God but lacks deeds) remains invisible  and is, in fact, demon-like.  ‘Nuff said.

You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless?  Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar?  You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.  And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend.  You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.  In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? (James 2:20-25).

James (rather un-pastor-like) calls this “someone” man “foolish” (Greek, kenosliterally “empty-headed.”)  Which reminds me of the old line:  “Be careful you’re not so open-minded that your brains fall out!”  In this case, it’s empty-headed to make faith whatever you want it to be.

To underscore his argument, James offers two key examples of faith from the Jewish Scriptures.

Abraham, the patriarch.  He was “considered righteous for what he did.”  Provocative, James.  A bit edgy given Genesis 15:6—“And [Abraham] believed the LORD, and he counted it to him as righteousness.”  God counted Abraham’s belief in the promise as righteous.  But James considers Abraham’s action that followed his faith. . . his faith was working together with his works.”  Not faith or works.  Not faith plus works.  Faith expressed by works.  Faith working together with his works (the zenith being obediently offering his only son Isaac on an altar).

A more mundane illustration I’ve used a thousand times.  “I believe  this chair will hold me.  It’s only living, useful faith when I sit down.”  (I sit.  Thankfully, chair held.)  Faith then is “made complete” (Greek, teleioo—brought to consummation, perfected) by what we do.  Faith without commensurate action is not firing on all cylinders.  John Calvin:  “Faith alone justifies, but the faith which justifies is not alone.”

Rahab, the prostitute.  Far less esteemed a person than Abraham, but the same family of faith.  Rahab believed the spies—and acted accordingly. 

Now a bit gross, a corpse example . . .

As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead (James 2:26).

No spirit in the body, the body’s dead.  No deeds in the faith-profession, faith’s dead.

* * * * *

What prompted James to launch into “faith without works is dead”?  One can only theorize.  But context brings us back to his rebuke against the sin of partiality (2:1-13).   He means for his Jewish-Christian readers to fulfill “the royal law” and ” . . . love your neighbor as yourself” (2:8),   Such love, irrespective of persons, is sorely needed among these dispersed-among-the-nations Christians.  They must not only profess faith in King Jesus, they must not only maintain ceremonial aspects of the faith, they must work their faith in neighbor-love.  It won’t merit them anything.  But it will prove in which master they truly believe.

It’s a strange land where we live.  Getting stranger by the day.  Someone has offered to take us home.  We must trust him.  And, trusting, do what he says.

 

 

Spiritual Gifts: Just Then or Now Too?

O PreacherThe question shouldn’t be left to Bible scholars or serious theologians.  It has important practical and personal ramifications for the whole church of Jesus Christ.

For example, in Romans 12:6 Paul writes, “Having gifts that differ according to the grace given to us, let us us them . . . ”  If spiritual gifts have ceased, then the “user” has no gift-grace to offer and the recipient none to receive.  We might say grace in the form of gifts is scarcer now than in the first century.

Again in 1 Corinthians 12:7, Paul writes, “To each person is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.”  And in 1 Corinthians 14:12, Paul admonishes the church, ” . . . since you are eager for the manifestations of the Spirit, strive to excel in building up the church.”  If these manifestations have ceased, the Body of Christ no longer receives “good” from them and is left without a means of upbuilding available earlier.

Recently I discovered an excellent study by Dr. Sam Storms.  He introduces himself as “an Amillennial, Calvinistic, charismatic, credo-baptistic, complementarian, Christian Hedonist.”  (If  you draw a blank at any of those terms, don’t worry.  Just remember we’re saved by grace through faith!)  Since 2008, Sam has  been Lead Pastor for Preaching and Vision at Bridgeway Church in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Below are links to the study.  If you have any interest in this subject or especially if you’re trying to decide on which side of the line you should stand, I heartily recommend this to you.

http://www.samstorms.com/all-articles/post/are-miraculous-gifts-for-today—part-i

http://www.samstorms.com/all-articles/post/are-miraculous-gifts-for-today—part-ii

What do you think?  Just then or now too?  I’d love to hear from you!

 

 

 

Discrimination-Free Zone

O PreacherBack in the mid-1970’s we planted a church in a prosperous northern New Jersey community.  Businessmen and women daily commuted to New York City and back.  And I fantasized:  “Maybe some honcho high on a corporation hierarchy will join our little church!  Think of the prestige!  The tithes!”  Well, we gathered in wonderful people, but no Exxon-Mobil executive.  Fine with James . . .

My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don’t show favoritism (James 2:1).

James cares about his readers (“My brothers”)—Jewish Christians dispersed among the nations because of faith in the Lord Jesus Messiah, cut off from their homeland, struggling to survive.  And, therefore, most susceptible to fawn over the rich and ignore the poor.  “Don’t!”  Glory is not in possessions but the Lord.

Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in.  If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, “Here’s a good seat for you,” but say to the poor man, “You stand there” or “Sit on the floor by my feet,” have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? (James 2:2-4).

“Suppose” doesn’t imply make-believe.  James’ anecdote is true.  And why should it not be?   Can’t we find the same partiality in ourselves?  Had my Exxon-Mobil executive shown up, I would have tripped over myself making him welcome and comfortable, barely noticing the bad-smelling homeless man who came by bike.

The probing question:  ” . . . have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?” 

Discriminated” implies evaluating the difference between things.  In this case, on the basis of outward appearance.  It leads to judging the finely-dressed to be worth more and the shabbily-dressed less.  Pastor Kim Riddlebarger’s comment reminds us how abhorrent their attitude:  “This is especially heinous at a time when such people (the poor Jewish Christians) are suffering, not because they somehow angered God who is now punishing them, but because they have come to believe that Jesus is the Lord of glory and now they are being persecuted because of their profession of faith in Christ” (http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/sermons-on-the-book-of-james-p/).

Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him?  But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court?  Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?  (James 2:5-7).

In 1978 Donald Kraybill authored, The Upside-Down Kingdom.  So God’s reign is.  The world celebrates the wealthy.  When’s the last time a magazine published “The 100 Poorest People in the World”?  But God has chosen “those who are poor in the eyes of the world” to be rich in more than money–“faith.”  (A treasure given by grace and worth more than the Powerball Lottery prize.)   Ah, that poor beggar, rich?  Yes, now rich in faith with his name written as heir to “the kingdom [God] has promised those who love him.”

But, see what you’ve done, James urges.  By pushing aside the poor, you’ve opposed God.  You’ve actively treated the poor with contempt.  At the same time you’ve honored those who exploit you and drag you into court and slander the name of Christ your Lord.

(By the way, James doesn’t hint that the rich are all evil and the poor all holy.  He writes in general terms, which history shows accurate.  More often than not the wealthy enjoy their “heaven on earth”, while the poor stand more open to the Gospel.)

It occurs to me this rich man/poor man discrimination probably isn’t a Top Ten Problem in Today’s Church.  (Or maybe my church world is too small.)  Bigger than rich-poor discrimination is straight-gay discrimination.  As I see it, if we suspect a church visitor is gay, sirens flash.  We feel a sudden pressure to run to the rest room.  We “discriminate”  (evaluate their difference)— and decide that difference is a gulf too dangerous or unpleasant to span.  We certainly don’t treat them like an  Exxon-Mobil executive.  I know this isn’t a simple issue.  More needs addressing that I can say here.  Sure, God calls homosexual practice sinful.  He does the same with adultery.   But, since God loves the world, shouldn’t we?  Since we belong to the king who loved prostitutes, shouldn’t we obey our king’s royal law and love the gay?

If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right.  But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers.  For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.  For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a lawbreaker (James 2:8-11).

The “royal law” is “the law belonging to the king.”  “Love your neighbor as yourself.”  No need for James to identify “your neighbor.”  It’s both rich man and poor, straight and gay.  In God’s eyes, neither holds an advantage.   Break this “royal law” of the King and you incur guilt.

Therefore, James prods the people  . . .

Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom, because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment!  (2:12,13).

” . . . the law that gives freedom” is God’s Old Testament Law as fulfilled in Christ, marked by mercy and summarized in “love your neighbor as yourself”.   That’s the law, says James, by which you will be judged.  But remember this and tremble:  ” . . . judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful.”  But rejoice:  for the merciful man, “Mercy triumphs over judgment.”

The lesson is written in red:  Don’t evaluate people by the world’s standards.  Mercifully love, especially the one you presume doesn’t deserve it.

* * * * *

“O God with whom there is no partiality, may I mark off a ‘discrimination-free zone’ wherever I am.  Help me remember I’d be rejected except for your mercy in Christ.  May I show mercy to those I’m apt to condemn.  And, thereby, may they come to know your mercy.  If I’m to err, may it be, not on the  judgment-side, but the mercy-side.   Empower me to live by the love-law of my King.  In his name I pray.  Amen.                                            


Radical Islamist Ideology

P.AllanPerhaps today we should just “weep with those who weep” in Orlando.  Or maybe we should be urged to weep, because by tomorrow or Wednesday for most of us the slaughter’s horror will have dissipated.  Mass shootings have become almost commonplace.  And the investigative accounts of the killer’s identity, family life, motivation, etc. seem the same old story.

I listened to President Obama, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, as well as a few “lesser” politicians comment.  Sadly familiar.  If ever a sign that we live in a fallen, evil world, this is it—not just the shootings, but the responses.  Know the identity of the politician before he or she speaks, you know what he or she will say.  We call it “politics”; but it really is ideology.  (“A system of ideas and ideals, especially one that forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy”–Oxford Dictionaries).

The ideologues who theorize guns are the problem push for tougher (“common sense”) gun laws.  Those who theorize our defense is insufficient push for banning Muslims from the country or stronger police presence.  I’m not qualified to speak  specifically on any of these “pushes.”  I do agree with the mostly unheard voices who argue that Radical Islam is at war with America—except I would add, “and at war with the non-Sharia Muslim world.

When Jesus predicted, “And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars” (Matthew 24:6), I understand him to mean that generation leading up to 70 A.D. when Rome finally crushed Jerusalem.  But I also take him to mean “double fulfillment”; that is, wars as part of “birth pains” (Matthew 24:8) will mark these last days leading up to the Last Day.  And, though far different from the tactics of our two world wars, Jesus certainly included this Radical Islamist war.

In World War 2, Hitler held an ideology—broadly, the superiority of the Aryan race.  We beat it with bombs, as today’s war necessitates.  But understanding the enemy and his ideology is necessary too.  How can we not realize our attackers are not “lone wolves” or “isolated crazies”?  Radical Islam intends, in the name of Allah, to take over the world.  Tightening airport security will not defeat demonic worldview.

“The Clarion Project” (http://www.clarionproject.org/understanding-islamism/islamic-extremismprovides an informative introduction to Radical Islam Ideology . . .

Islamic extremism is driven by an interpretation of Islam that believes that Islamic law, or sharia, is an all-encompassing religious-political system. Since it is believed to be proscribed by Allah (Arabic for “God”) sharia must be enforced in the public sphere by a global Islamic state. As such, Islamic extremists consider it to be the only truly legitimate form of governance and reject democracy and human rights values.

Thus, the ultimate objective of Islamic extremists is the merger of “mosque and state” under sharia law. Those who favor such an approach are called Islamists. Their ideology is called Islamism, or political Islam.

(Photo: © Reuters)(Photo: © Reuters)

Islamic extremists believe they are obligated to install this form of governance in Muslim-majority territories, countries and, eventually, the entire world. In the minds of Islamic extremists, they are promoting justice and freedom by instituting sharia.

In some cases, Islamic extremists even describe sharia as a superior form of “democracy.”

Islamic extremists have intermediate political goals which they believe will pave the way for the global implementation of sharia. One of these goals is the removal of non-Muslim military forces from Muslim lands and the overthrow of “enemy” regimes.

Acts of Islamic extremism includes terrorism, human rights abuses, the advancement of sharia-based governance, bigotry towards non-Muslims and rival Muslims and overall hostility to the West and, in particular, Western democracy.

Today we “weep with those who weep”, despite our conviction that the Bible calls homosexual behavior sin.  These are men and women created in God’s image, and our response to them should be brokenhearted prayer, not condemnation.  Our plea for them should be for God’s grace in Christ, as we ourselves continue to need.

It’s also apparently true that most Muslims are not radical extremists, just as not all Christians are abortion-doctor killers or homophobic.

That brings us to how as Jesus-followers we should respond.  We can’t defeat terrorists bent on destroying us.  We can’t out-debate their ideology.  (Though we—here meaning our political leaders—must realize this is a war against an ideology whose adherents mean, in Allah’s name, to take over the world.)

What we can do, what we must do, is pray.  Though written in a different context, the apostle Paul’s words apply . . .

For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does.
The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world.
On the contrary, they have divine power to demolish strongholds.
We demolish arguments and every pretension
that sets itself up against the knowledge of God,
and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.
(2 Corinthians 10:3-5)

Therefore put on the full armor of God,
so that when the day of evil comes,
you may be able to stand your ground,
and after you have done everything, to stand.
Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist,
with the breastplate of righteousness in place,
and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace.
In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith,
with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.
Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit,
which is the word of God.
And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests.
(Ephesians 6:13-18a)

Does it seem  absurd to believe that our little prayers can affect how God works in the world?  Remember . . .

The prayer of a righteous person
has great power as it is working.
(James 5:16b)

Do What God’s Word Says

O PreacherI listen to God’s word like a couch potato.  (Do potatoes listen?)   Well, I don’t always listen that way.  But too often I listen without a mind to do it.  Which is what James warns against . . .

 Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says [For] Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like a man who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like (James 1:22-24). 

Hard words.  Especially given the occasion.  James’ Jewish Christian readers have been dispersed among the nations.  Some driven from their homes by persecutors.  Some living in foreign lands.  Many, I think, simply seeking  solitude in their homes repeating life-saving Gospel to themselves.  But, James warns,  hearing alone is self-deceptive.  “Do what it says.”  (The Greek verb tense implies “Keep giving yourself to do what it says.”)  An ongoing way of life, not merely an occasional obedience.

If we listen without doing the word our pastor preaches, we deceive ourselves.  Why is listening-without-doing self-deceptive?  James explains it’s like a quick look in the mirror, then forgetting what you look like.  I’m always far more handsome in my mind than in my mirror.   In the same way, James explains, if we don’t do the word we hear, we presume we’ve got it.

For example:  “Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of many kinds . . . ” (1:2).  If I hear my pastor preach it, but don’t “chew” it over in my mind and start practicing it, I’ll forget it.  The word won’t affect my attitude or action.  And, instead of revealing Jesus-in-me, I’ll show others my sin-nature.

But the man who looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues to do this, not forgetting what he has heard, but doing it– he will be blessed in what he does (James 1:25).

Contrasted with the mere hearer is “the man who looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues to do this . . . ”  No cursory look, an intent one.  The Greek is parakupto.  Luke uses it of Peter, who “rose and ran to [Jesus’] tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen cloths . . . ” (Luke 24:12).  An investigative study longing to see his Lord.   Nor does the intent-looker forget because he starts to put into practice the word heard.

Now:  what is this “perfect law that gives freedom” (literally, “the perfect law of liberty”)?   It’s the Law of Moses—the only law these Jewish Christians know.  The mention of “law” demands comment, since we’ve learned from Galatians  that “by works of the law no one will be justified” (Galatians 2:16). 

Comment #1:  God’s moral law (not ceremonial or dietary) remains in place.  Murder and adultery are transgressions.  No other gods before God remains the rule.

Comment #2:   Jesus fulfilled God’s Law.  (“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them” (Matthew 5:27).  Therefore, he is the believer’s righteousness before God—one reason James calls this “the law of liberty.”

Comment #3:  The righteous requirement of the law is being fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit (Romans 8:4).  The Spirit enables us to progressively “walk” (like little children)  in God’s good, perfect and righteous law—a second reason why God’s law now gives freedom.

Comment #4  The one who does God’s law is promised heavenly happiness.  ” . . . he will be blessed in what he does.”

James sums up this section of his letter by driving home applications about what he’s urged . . .

If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not keep a tight rein on his tongue, he deceives himself and his religion is worthless. Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world (1:26,27).

To James (and thus to our Lord) words are consequential.  Therefore, our tongue (!) plays a far-reaching role, even (especially) in our culture where words are “cheap” because indiscriminately, often thoughtlessly, spouted.  Tight-reign the tongue!

Suppose, dear Jewish Christian reader, you are scrupulous about keeping the Sabbath holy and avoiding meat sacrificed to idols, but your unreigned tongue curses your neighbor?  All your scrupulous devotion to your religion is worth nothing!

Furthermore, dear Jewish Christian,  pure and undefiled religion in God’s eyes is what you may not consider “religion” at all:  caring for orphans and widows in their troubles and keeping yourself unstained from this fallen world.  In your dispersion and persecution many opportunities will arise for you to offer this care.  So will the danger of your becoming friends with this world (see James 4:4) and, thus, morally polluted by its corrupted ways.

* * * *

Far-removed from us is all this, no?  No!  How prone we are to hear God’s word with no mind to do it!  How ignorant of God’s word we are, not because we don’t hear sermons and read Bibles, but because our default position is to gather biblical information instead of pursuing biblical obedience.  The heavenly happiness that comes from doing what God says is too often absent from our lives, while we pursue happiness in wealth and possessions.  And, finally, perhaps we should fear near-perfect Sunday worship performances in favor of caring for the needy while staying free from the world’s moral pollution.

Help us, O God, to be better doers of your word
and not hearers only.

           

God the Tempter?

O PreacherIn the 1970s comedian Flip Wilson provoked laughs:  “The devil made me do it.”  In the mid-40s A.D. Jewish Christians provoked  correction from James with:  “God made me do it!”

James. leader of the Jerusalem church, is writing to Jewish Christians dispersed by persecution among the nations.  He reminds them of God’s character and their own sinful nature, calling them to morally upright living in a hostile world.  He begins with a promised blessing . . .

Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him (1:12).   James knows his readers are “under trial” (payrasmos), potentially persecuted for their faith.  But persecutors haven’t gained the upper hand; the devil hasn’t grabbed dominion.  This is a God-test.   And James promises the test-stander “will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him.”

In the Greek games, at the start-line athletes poise.  The signal sounds.  For the finish they sprint all-out.   A head-wreath for the winner—the conqueror’s crown  So, promises James, endure the trial, stand the test.  At the end you’ll be crowned with eternal life.  What more motivation do Christ-believers need?

“Love” is an interesting term here, don’t you think?  James didn’t write, ” . . . promised to those who believe in him” or ” . . . to those who obey him” but ” . . . to those who love him.”  The Greek is agapooin.  Not merely love as a feeling, but love as a matter of will and action.  Not a husband bringing flowers home, but remaining faithful when tempted by a younger woman.  Not a wife kissing her husband, but caring for him in his poor health.

When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone; but each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed.  Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death. (1:13-15).

I’m most prey to temptation when tired or stressed.  Not surprising, then, that these dispersed and persecuted Jewish Christians would be tempted.  But why blame God?  Because God is sovereign in this trial/test, and they’re being tempted to sin.  God must be the ultimate tempter.  Or, like the ancient Israelites in the desert, blame God, Moses, Aaron, anybody but themselves.

Don’t say it, James demands.  Why?  Because, as James Adamson writes in The Epistle of James, “Tempting others to evil, would require a delight in evil, of which [God] in himself is incapable.”  God’s “tempting” is actually a test in which, unlike the devil,  he wants the believer to succeed!  God entices no one to sin.

What, then, are temptation’s sources?  ” . . . each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed.”

Brock Turner, a Stanford University student, was recently found guilty of sexual assault (and received an unbelievably unjust six-month jail sentence).  Turner  blamed the female victim, blamed alcohol and blamed an unfamiliar-to-him permissive college environment.  Not only did he not repent; he refused to accept any responsibility.

James rejects such arrogance.  It’s our morally evil desire that hooks and drags us off.  Young man sees a drunken, desirable young woman.  He’s hooked.  His desire explodes with lust and births the act of sin.  Make no mistake:  when this becomes life’s pattern, it ends in death apart from God.

Don’t be deceived, my dear brothers.  Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.  He chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all he created (1:16-18).

Echoing the prophet’s words (“The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it?—Jeremiah 17:9), James warns Jewish Christians not to be deceived.  Not by their own sinful heart, nor by scheming Satan.  God gives good and perfect gifts, not evil ones to hook you on your lusts.

He is ” . . . the Father of heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.”  So Adamson comments:  “God’s benevolence is like a light which cannot be extinguished, eclipsed, or ‘shadowed out’ . . . The light of the sun may be blocked, for example, by some material object, so as to cast a shadow:  indeed, for a time in an eclipse, the direct light of the sun . . . may be shut off from the observer.  Nothing like that can block God’s light, interrupt the flow of his goodness, or put us ‘in shadow,’ so that we are out of the reach of his ‘radiance” (The Epistles of James). 

Look what goodness and perfection he has poured out!  He willed to give us [new] birth through the word of truth (the Gospel of Jesus Christ).”  A new start!  A do-over, this time with Spirit-power!  And what does James explain is God’s purpose in rebirth?
” . . . that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all he created.”  Despite dispersion and distress, these Jewish Christians are the first of a multitude like the sea’s sand who will be rebirthed and brought to complete perfection one day (James 1:2-4).  Therefore . . .

My dear brothers, take note of this:  Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry,  for man’s anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires.  Therefore, get rid of all moral filth and the evil that is so prevalent and humbly accept the word planted in you, which can save you (1:19-21).

Because they are God’s “firstfruits” living among unbelieving opponents, they must live morally upright lives—especially with their tongue.  Be quick listeners.  Be slow speakers.  Be slow temper-tantrum-ers.  (How hard in a world where we’re bombarded  with voices and long for someone to hear us!)  But believers (them and us) mustn’t react to hardships and frustrations with angry words,  because anger corrupts the righteous life God wants.

Moral manure and unbridled evil—get rid of it!  Like stinking clothes, strip it off!   Instead, welcome God’s Word implanted by memory and the Spirit in you.  It’s there, a grace-truth “invasion” of your fallen nature.  Embrace it.  Believe it!  Do it!  And on the Last Day, unlike sin which corrupts you forever, it can save you!

NOT GOD’S HAND!

<b>Temptation</b> Is Not Sin | Transformed

WHAT WILL I DO?

 

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 The Old Preacher

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)